Legal Opinion

Ruckstell Sales & Mfg. Co. v. Starr Transmission Corp.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 10, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

This action in equity is brought in the principal behalf of Ruekstell Sales & Manufacturing Company, a corporation, one of the plaintiffs named. The prayer is for an injunction and damages.

Infringement is charged of patent rights alleged to be held by said plaintiff as licensee of Perfecto Gear Differential Company, a corporation. The latter (which will hereinafter be designated as Perfecto Company) was made a party plaintiff without its consent, in order that the licensee might protect the rights alleged to be possessed by it. The license right affecting the patents to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'LEARY v. Liggett Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. Thompson v. MundheimNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API