Ex parte Mitchell

*84OPINION

GARCIA, Justice.

This appeal is taken from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding remanding appellant, James Mitchell, to the State of Oregon to answer three felony charges. We affirm.

In his sole point of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in ordering his extradition to the State of Oregon because the evidence is insufficient to prove he is the individual named in the governor’s warrant.

The State introduced into evidence the executive warrant of the Governor of Texas. The warrant contains the - necessary recitals consistent with article 51.13 of the Texas Code…