Legal Opinion

Williams v. Professional Transportation, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 29, 2004No. 03-1387, 03-1453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS concurred. Judge LUTTIG wrote a concurring and dissenting opinion.

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

This ease is a contract dispute between CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) and Perry and Teddi Williams (Williams), who own a private limousine service used by CSXT to transport its train crews and property within West Virginia. In its most recent order, the district court ordered CSXT to pay Williams $1,891,028.21 and to enter into a five-year, exclusive, noncancellable, but transferable contract with Williams, with an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  2. Robert C. Hensley v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, and Alan Modliszewski, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. Frederick L. Millner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. Young v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Hill v. Kansas Gas Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wheelabrator Lisbon Inc. v. State of Connecticut Department of Public Utility ControlDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
  2. Perry Williams Teddi Williams, D/B/A Williams Transport v. Professional Transportation, Incorporated United Leasing, Incorporated Csx Transportation, Incorporated, Perry Williams Teddi Williams, D/B/A Williams Transport v. Professional Transportation, Incorporated United Leasing, Incorporated Csx Transportation, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API