Day v. Larsen
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Judge upholding the clerk of his court in refusing to satisfy on the record a certain judgment. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bean.
This is a summary proceeding against the clerk of the trial court to compel him to enter of record the sat*248isfaction of a judgment. The facts are that on March ii, 1895, a judgment was rendered in a civil action in favor of Joe Day and against E. S. Larsen for the sum of $138.20, besides costs and disbursements. This judgment was secretly paid in full to Day on the 15th of the same month, and the judgment creditor duly executed and acknowledged a certificate of satisfaction thereof in writing. After payment, but before the certificate was tendered to the clerk for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boston & Colorado Smelting Co. v. PlessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
- Alderman v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Pirie v. HarknessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Henry v. TraynorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Boston Tea Co. v. BrubakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smelker v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Stearns v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Stoddard v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Wagner v. GoldschmidtOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Jones v. BhattacharyyaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.