Legal Opinion

Yardley of London, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 5, 1953No. C. D. 1495PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

The importation, the subject of this controversy, consists of two “Albro” powder filling machines and parts thereof imported-from England.

The collector of customs classified the mechanisms within the provision of paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 372) for “all other machines, finished or unfinished, not specially provided for,” and parts thereof, and assessed duty thereon at the rate of 27% per centum ad valorem. It appears that the collector’s decision was based upon the premise that the machines in question were “packaging” machines and,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Chase Bottle & Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Import Export Service of N. J. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Scantrade, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API