Legal Opinion

Houston Packing Co. v. Griffith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Wilson County; E. A. Stevens, Judge. Action by W. D. Griffith against the Houston Packing Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, C. J.

The controversy grows out of sales by Griffith to the Houston Packing Company of certain steers that were to be fat. The petition of Griffith alleged, in sub- ' stance, that after certain of the steers were shipped and paid for according to the agreement, and the time came for the shipment of the remainder, he notified defendant that he was ready to deliver same and requested its agent to come to Floresville and cut out and accept said steers, which were fat and in proper condition for delivery to the number of 250 head, hut said agent refused to cut out and accept same upon the sole ground…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. P. J. Donovan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Dimmit County Pasture Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. PearceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Pacific Express Co. v. LothropCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. IsenhowerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Gorman & WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Commander v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API