Pittman v. State

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from a denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing wherein he sought to vacate the court’s sentence of robbery first degree and assault with intent to kill.1 We affirm.

Movant’s conviction was affirmed by this court in State v. Pittman, 569 S.W.2d 277. In movant’s first point on appeal, he contends that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing as a matter of law because his Rule 27.26 motion alleged “that his attorney made no attempt to interview witnesses, took no depositions from state’s witnesses and failed to properly object or lay a…