Legal Opinion

Husda Realty Corp. v. Padien

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided July 21, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter Tom, J.

The issue in this case is whether a landlord can recover possession of a rent-stabilized apartment from a tenant for overcharging her undertenant rent even after the undertenant has vacated the premises before the expiration of the notice to cure.

Respondent Padien has been a rent-stabilized tenant of the subject premises since 1980. In or about May 1985 she took in a subtenant, respondent Hill, without permission of the landlord. The undertenant lived in the apartment until September 1986 when she had a disagreement with the prime tenant. As a result of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Towers Ltd. Partnership v. FreumanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985
  2. A. Dubois & Son, Inc. v. Goldsmith Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Leighton's Inc. v. Century Circuit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cambridge Development, LLC v. StaysnaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Ariel Associates, L. L. C. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Jack Moritz Co. Management v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API