Legal Opinion

People v. Mercado

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2015PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determinations regarding founded suspicion of criminality justifying a request to search the car, and then the trunk, and defendant’s consent to a search of the vehicle, all involve mixed questions of law and fact. The determinations are supported by the record, and are beyond further review (see People v Valerio, 95 NY2d 924, 925 [2000]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ValerioNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. OdumCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
  2. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. People v. YoneyamaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API