Legal Opinion

Holihan v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to correct judgment as to allowance of interest or claim sued upon.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

On November 14, 1900, the plaintiffs entered judgment against the defendant for the sum of $936.83, with interest and costs, in an action for goods sold and delivered. Interest was calculated from January 18, 1899, the date of the last delivery of the goods, although no demand was made upon the defendant’s comptroller until January 18, 1900. Defendant contends that the interest should have been calculated from the date of demand, and moves to amend the judgment by deducting from the amount thereof the difference between the interest for the two periods. As to the payment of interest on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. People, ex rel. Bank of Monroe v. Canal CommissionersNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Paul v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
  4. Donnelly v. City of BrooklynNew York City Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re MayorNew York Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API