Mills v. Parker

Because I believe that the trial court properly struck the answer of Hazel Mills7 based on failure to respond to plaintiff’s request for production of documents and, therefore, properly granted specific performance of the contract to sell realty, I respectfully dissent in *625part. Because I believe that a decision of the fraud claim is premature, I concur in the judgment only regarding that count.

Parker’s request for production of documents was filed and served with the complaint on Hazel Mills and sought production of “[t]he original (or a copy on which the notarial date is legible) of the…