People v. Sims
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Entirely aside from conduct and statements of defendant prior to the fire touching on his possible motive and intent, there was competent evidence, chiefly in the testimony of the People’s arson investigator, from which the jury could have concluded that the fire was of incendiary origin thus satisfying the requirement of corroboration of his confession. (CPL 60.50.)
The other assertions of error now advanced by defendant were not preserved for our review.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. PettisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. Kazmarick, New York County Courts1978
- People v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.