Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kasberg v. Ypsilanti Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2010No. Docket No. 287682Published

1DissentMarkey, P.J.

I respectfully dissent. While appellants appealed a property tax assessment “under the property tax laws of this state,” their sole basis for relief was a claim to an exemption that did not arise “under the property tax laws of this state.” Consequently, I would affirm. The Tax Tribunal could not grant an exemption that the Legislature has plainly entrusted to the State Housing Development Authority (SHDA) to grant. MCL 125.1415a. Moreover, even if the Tax Tribunal has jurisdiction, I would still affirm because appellant National Church Residences of Win Ypsilanti, MI (National), did not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bowie v. ArderMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Fox v. Board of Regents of University of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hess v. Cannon TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Langdon v. Judges of the Wayne Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API