Oregon Real Estate Co. v. Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
Prom Multnomah: John B. Cleland, Judge. Suit by the Oregon Real Estate Company to restrain the City of Portland and its officers from enforcing the collection of sundry street improvement warrants by a sale of plaintiff’s property, and to annul them. There was a decree granting part of the relief demanded, from which both parties appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
In March, 1898, the common council of the City of Portland, by regular ordinance,'declared it expedient and necessary to repair Union Avenue from the north line of East Burnside Street to the south side of Weidler Street, in the City of Portland, and directed that the cost of such repair be assessed upon the adjacent property, in pursuance of sections 124 and 125 of the city charter then in force (Laws, 1893, pp. 810, 849). The kind of work directed to be done was as follows: “First. From the north line of East Burnside Street to the south line of Weidler Street, save and except the elevated…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Cook v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oregon Real Estate Co. v. GambellOregon Supreme Court · 1901