State v. Barfield

Ruffin, Judge.

On February 2, 1997, Cody Duane Barfield, a minor, was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and charged with violating OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (1) and (5). Barfield moved to suppress the results of his breath test, arguing that he was not properly read his implied consent rights. The trial court granted the motion, finding that the warning given Barfield deviated from the mandated language of OCGA.§ 40-5-67.1 (b). The State appealed, and for the following reasons, we affirm.

“In cases involving the review of the grant or denial of motions to suppress or motions in…