Legal Opinion

Baciu v. City University of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Marin, J.), dated July 24, 2000, which denied her motion, in effect, for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The claimant failed to provide a reasonable explanation why the physician’s affirmation in support of her motion for leave to file a late claim, which was submitted with her motion denominated as one for renewal, could not have been provided with the original motion. Consequently, the claimant’s motion was, in effect, one for reargument (see, Muro v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muro v. Bay Ready Mix & Supplies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Privitera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Thein v. Mamaroneck Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jenkinson v. NaccaratoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Holmes v. HansonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API