Legal Opinion

Remington Rand Div. of Sperry Rand Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 12, 1964No. 5147Published

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the imported “Charge-A-Lite” rechargeable flashlight is dutiable as a “flashlight,” within paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified. The statutes involved are:

Paragraph 353:

* * * articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device * * *; all the foregoing, and parts thereof, finished or unfinished, wholly or in chief value of metal, and not specially provided for, 35 per centum ad valorem.

Paragraph 353 (as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121,165, T.D.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Remington Rand Div. of Sperry Rand Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API