Legal Opinion
L.N.K. ex rel. Kavanaugh v. St. Mary's Medical Center
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 2003No. 82A01-0210-CV-417PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellants-plaintiffs L.N.K., Jennifer Kavanaugh, and Robert Kavanaugh (Ka-vanaughs) appeal the grant of summary judgment to appellces-defendants St. Mary's Medical Center and Mulberry Center (the Center). Specifically, the Ka-vanaughs argue that the trial court erroneously found that seduction is not an actionable tort in Indiana. The Kavanaughs also allege that the trial court erred in holding that the Center is not vicariously liable for Sean Lehman's seduction of LN.K., the Kavanaugh's minor daughter who went to the Center seeking help for drug abuse. Concluding that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stropes Ex Rel. Taylor v. Heritage House Childrens Center of Shelbyville, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Jordan v. DeeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Indianapolis Power & Light Co. v. Brad Snodgrass, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Gomez v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Creel v. I.C.E. & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jennifer Cox v. Evansville Police Department and The City of Evansville Babi Beyer v. The City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Doe v. Vigo Cnty.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- BREASTON v. BooksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jane Doe v. Vigo County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Jane Doe v. Vigo County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.