Legal Opinion

United States v. Ricky Douglas Haynes, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 22, 2014No. 12-12689, 12-13244PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to decide whether a federal prisoner who directly appeals a resentencing may raise new arguments unrelated to the errors corrected at the resentencing. Ricky Haynes, a federal prisoner, filed a motion to vacate his sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which the district court granted in part because his sentence for possession of a firearm and ammunition as a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), exceeded the 10-year statutory maximum, id. § 924(a)(2). Now that he has been resentenced on that count, Haynes wants more. He asks us to revisit an argument that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. Joseph SilvestriCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Christopher LoveCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Angel PuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Talley v. United States of America (INMATE 2)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025
  3. United States v. Altonne Marquaviyes FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Michael PalmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API