United States v. Ricky Douglas Haynes, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to decide whether a federal prisoner who directly appeals a resentencing may raise new arguments unrelated to the errors corrected at the resentencing. Ricky Haynes, a federal prisoner, filed a motion to vacate his sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which the district court granted in part because his sentence for possession of a firearm and ammunition as a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), exceeded the 10-year statutory maximum, id. § 924(a)(2). Now that he has been resentenced on that count, Haynes wants more. He asks us to revisit an argument that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Joseph SilvestriCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Christopher LoveCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Angel PuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Talley v. United States of America (INMATE 2)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025
- United States v. Altonne Marquaviyes FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Michael PalmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017