Bradley v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY, Commissioner.
The testimony of Beverly Hendrix, the victim, and his companion, Myrtle Apple-gate, sustains the conviction of the appellant, Roy Bradley, of the offense of cutting another with a knife in sudden affray or heat of passion. ICRS 435.180. The testimony of the defendant’s wife shows self-defense. The defendant did not testify.
Implementing the constitutional protection against self-incrimination, KRS 455.-090 declares that failure of a defendant in a criminal prosecution to testify in his own behalf “shall not be commented upon or create any presumption against him.” In the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WolfeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Sebree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Farley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Dykes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caldwell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
- Jackson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
- Dillard v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Adams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- Green v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.