Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 16, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The testimony of Beverly Hendrix, the victim, and his companion, Myrtle Apple-gate, sustains the conviction of the appellant, Roy Bradley, of the offense of cutting another with a knife in sudden affray or heat of passion. ICRS 435.180. The testimony of the defendant’s wife shows self-defense. The defendant did not testify.

Implementing the constitutional protection against self-incrimination, KRS 455.-090 declares that failure of a defendant in a criminal prosecution to testify in his own behalf “shall not be commented upon or create any presumption against him.” In the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WolfeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sebree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Farley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Dykes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  2. Jackson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  3. Dillard v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Adams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  5. Green v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API