Legal Opinion · Dissent

Superior Oil Co. v. Humble Oil and Refining Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 20, 1970No. 50206Published

1DissentSanders, Justice

The majority holds that since the Court must interpret the contract, the case must be tried on the merits rather than disposed of on the dilatory exception of prematurity. The holding, in my opinion, is unsound.

Article 930 of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure provides:

“On the trial of the dilatory exception, evidence may be introduced to support or controvert any of the objections pleaded, when the grounds thereof do not appear from the petition.”

At the hearing on the dilatory exception, the parties offered evidence. It consisted both of testimony and an admission of fact and genuineness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. D'Antoni v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  2. Sugar Field Oil Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API