Legal Opinion

Stone Mountain Industries, Inc. v. Wilhite

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1965No. 23032PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The object of zoning is to re strict the owner’s use of his own property. The zoning ordinance and map can legally restrict repeated applications for zoning. Ga. L. 1956, p. 3332, Sec. 10, p. 3340; Newman v. Smith, 217 Ga. 465 (123 SE2d 305). The ordinance here involved first provided that when an application to rezone was denied, another application could not be made until the expiration of 12 months. That was the provision of the ordinance when an application was denied, but in less than 12 months therefrom the ordinance was amended to fix the waiting time at 18…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Balkcom v. CrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  2. Murphey v. MurpheySupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. Newman v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Recycle & Recover, Inc. v. Georgia Board of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. George v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. McLennan v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Recycle & Recover, Inc. v. Georgia Board of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Recycle & Recover, Inc. v. Georgia Board of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API