Holzheuser v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
~ [11] Appellant, Robert Allen Holizheuser (Holzheuser), contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence used against him at trial. He asserts that the affidavit in support of the search warrant was inadequate to justify its issuance. Holzheuser also contends that the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to sustain two of his three convictions. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for resentencing in a manner consistent with this opinion. ,
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Holzheuser states these issues:
'I. The trial court erred in denying…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cordova v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Lee v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Terry Smith v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Samuel P. Snell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Mueller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.