Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Eckert

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 10, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Complainant appeals from a decree dismissing his bill of complaint. Its object was to set aside, as fraudulent, a conveyance made by defendant Paul W. Eckert, to his wife, Esther D. Eckert, on October 31st, 1932, of his interest in lands theretofore held by them in entirety.

Concededly, there was no consideration for the grant, and it is clear that the grantor was then insolvent. On August 26th, 1931, he embarked on a business venture with another, and, in connection therewith, incurred the obligation of a lease for a term of three years. The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barsotti v. MercedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  2. Levy v. D'AlesandroNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Lone Star Cement Corp. v. PalmerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API