Legal Opinion

State v. Driscoll

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922No. 17036PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSHALL, C. J.:

Epitomized Opinion

The prosecuting witness, Gladys Cosgrove, aged 17 years, procured a taxicab, at a public station, in Bucyrus, to take her to her home, about three-fourths of a mile distant. The defendant, an employe of the taxicab company, started to take her, but instead of going directly, drove into the country and criminally assaulted her, against her continued resistance. The defendant contradicted the girl’s' story and endeavored to make it a case of consent. He was found guilty, and the common pleas rendered judgment against him. .

The Court of Appeals reversed .the…

2Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. WoleryOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. GordonOhio Supreme Court · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API