Legal Opinion

Frush v. Hamner

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided April 9, 1959No. 970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

The petitioner, Ruth M. Frush, is presently confined in the Huntington State Hospital, Huntington, West Virginia, a mental institution, by order of a state court, and seeks her release by writ of habeas corpus. Briefly, she says that she is illegally detained because her constitutional rights were violated in connection with her arrest, hearing, and confinement; and, further, that the state statutes under which state authorities ordered her confinement, W.Va.Code C. 27, Art. 5, Sec. 1, et seq., are unconstitutional. Her petition was filed and an order entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Urquhart v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Milam v. SkeenDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1953
  4. United States ex rel. Bruner v. AdamsDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Spinks v. ZellerDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API