Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Waldron

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 28, 1966No. 18,767Published

1DissentFerguson, Judge

I dissent.

The law officer of a general court-martial may not, under the guise of declaring a mistrial, rule finally on challenges of court members, for he is expressly forbidden to do so by Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 51, 10 USC § 851. I am of the view jeopardy attached in the first trial of this case and that, in consequence, on the second trial, the accused’s plea in bar should have been sustained.

0Moreover, I believe the record does not sustain the premise of the principal opinion that the members involved were “definitely disqualified,” for, though opportunity therefor was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API