Luck v. Miller
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Concurrence
RETIRED JUSTICE HARRISON, with whom JUSTICE COMPTON
joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
*450I concur that the evidence was sufficient to support the instruction given on a driver’s duty to operate a vehicle at a “reasonable speed under the existing conditions.”
I disagree that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the plaintiff to introduce the testimony of her minister that her reputation for truth and veracity was good. There was nothing extraordinary in either the examination or cross-examination of the witnesses in this routine automobile accident case, except in their being…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- George v. PilcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987