Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Urice

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 2004No. 100,031PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARL B. JONES, Judge.

[ 1 This case involves a purported exercise of a power of appointment granted to Eloise Cooper Bowers (Bowers) by her mother, Eloise Powers Cooper, in the Eloise Powers Cooper Revocable Trust Agreement (Cooper Trust). The Cooper Trust gave Bowers, a current income beneficiary of the Cooper Trust, a limited power to appoint Trust A of the Cooper Trust to or for the benefit of Bowers' grandson, Robert Drew Bowers, an incapacitated person (Drew). In the event Bowers failed to exercise the power of appointment, Trust A would be held for the benefit of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Hoyt v. Paul R. Miller, M.D., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Estate of Estes v. KramerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Estate of Sieber v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. UriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Edwards v. BancFIRSTCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Edwards v. UriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API