Legal Opinion
Mixon v. Attorney General of South Carolina
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided April 13, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-682-8PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BLATT, District Judge.
This habeas corpus action, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is before the court upon respondent’s motion for summary judgment, to which petitioner has responded after an appropriate warning under Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975). Petitioner challenges her incarceration by South Carolina authorities on the grounds that she is being held in violation of the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. The record includes a report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate made in accordance with the local rule of this District…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Robert Louis Roseboro v. Sam P. Garrison, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. MacDonaldDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- United States v. Calvin W. BreitCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985