Legal Opinion
Thomas v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided September 20, 1988No. 6 Div. 653PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLAN, Judge.
The trial court heard evidence pertaining to the appellant’s Rule 20 petition, after which it entered an order holding that trial counsel’s failure to move for a directed verdict of acquittal did not meet the standard of ineffective assistance of counsel.
In Hope v. State, 521 So.2d 1383 (Ala.Cr.App.1988), this Court wrote:
“In order to establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel a defendant must prove, first,
“ ‘that counsel’s performance was so deficient as to fall below an objective standard of reasonableness. Counsel’s conduct must be considered within the context…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baldwin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- George Herman Thomas v. Earnest L. Harrelson (Warden) and the Attorney General of the State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991