Legal Opinion

Ed Thielking, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 9, 2020No. 1870-16RUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2020-5

UNITED STATES TAX COURT ED THIELKING, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 1870-16R. Filed January 9, 2020. Michael A. Gilmer, for petitioner. Pamela J. Sewell, David Conrad, and Shawn P. Nowlan, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION MARVEL, Judge: Petitioner seeks a declaratory judgment under section 74761 that the Ed Thielking, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) and the 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bond v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  3. Hertz Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Taylor v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  5. Buzzetta Constr. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API