Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. Seale
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
■ Appeal by the plaintiffs, the Gorham Manufacturing Company and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 15th day of February, 1895, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint upon the merits.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The action is brought to set aside an assignment for the benefit of creditors as fraudulent, and made with the intent to hinder, delay and defraud creditors. The assignor was in business as a retail jeweler in Hew York, and the foundation of the plaintiffs’ claim seems to be the disappearance of 159 articles of jewelry valued at $18,280, which, according to the assignor’s books, should have been in his possession at the time of his failure, but of which there were received by the assignee sixty-one pieces, inventoried at the nominal value of .$l,178.'T5. This discrepancy is…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Gregory v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Meislahn v. Irving National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Newman v. ClappNew York Supreme Court · 1897
- Horrigan v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Meislahn v. Irving National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901