Legal Opinion

Union Investment Co. v. Abell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1921No. 22,091PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in ejectment in the district court for Hennepin county and to recover $100 per month since February 13,1920, until restoration of the premises. The case was tried before Dickson, J., who made findings and directed judgment in favor of defendant Harris. From an order denying its motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is an action in ejectment and involves the title to the property known as number 820 on Laurel avenue in the city of St. Paul. The trial court found that defendant Harris is the owner and entitled to the possession of the property, that plaintiff has no right, title or interest therein, and directed judgment in favor of defendant Harris. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying a new trial.

Prior to the transactions hereinafter mentioned, Emma L. Plunk was the owner of the property subject to two mortgages. She resided with her husband, Benjamin F. Plunk, in the state of Montana…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wood v. PriceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Ludowese v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Board of Education v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Cummings v. TaborWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Leigh v. GreenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bergquist v. Anderson-Greenwood Aviation Corp. (In Re Bellanca Aircraft Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
  2. Hentges v. P.H. Feely & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Scott v. Marquette National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API