Legal Opinion

State v. Hendriks

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 3, 1995No. 2369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

Henry H. Hendriks and John M. Hendriks were charged and convicted of violating state restrictions on the use of gill nets for shad fishing, set forth in S.C. Code Ann. § 50-17-422 (Supp. 1994). The Hendrikses contend the statute under which they were convicted does not apply to the shad fishing technique they employed and ask this court to construe the meaning of the statute. We affirm.

On March 18,1993, a South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Enforcement Officer observed the Hendrikses shad fishing with a gill net. He noted the gill net was pulled taut and barely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Green v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Alton Newton Evangelistic Ass'n v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. City of Sumter Police Department v. One (1) 1992 Blue Mazda TruckCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. VarvilCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API