Legal Opinion

Ana M Acevedo v. Andrew Saul

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 27, 2021No. 1:20-cv-08027Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x ANA M. ACEVEDO, : Plaintiff, : OPINION AND ORDER -against- : 20 Civ. 8027 (GWG) ANDREW SAUL, : Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------x GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Ana M. Acevedo brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying plaintiff’s claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”).…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API