Legal Opinion

Vann v. State Highway Department

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1957No. 36514PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

1. The usual general grounds of the motion for new trial, being neither argued nor insisted upon, are treated as abandoned.

2. In the special ground of the motion for new trial numbered 4 error is assigned on the admission of evidence as to the fair market value of the land taken. The contention of the plaintiff in error is that the sole question for decision was the value of the property immediately before the taking and the value of the remainder of the property immediately after the taking. The contention that the case of State Highway Board v. Bridges, 60 Ga. App. 240 (3 S. E. 2d 907),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central Georgia Power Co. v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Flemister v. Central Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. State Highway Board v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. City of Reynolds v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southern Electric Generating Co. v. LeibacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Fulton County v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Fulton County v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. State Highway Department v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Fulton County v. PowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API