Legal Opinion
Echemann v. Echemann
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 16, 2018No. 17–17–15PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Thomas A. Echemann ("Tom"), appeals the August 28, 2017 judgment entry of the Shelby County Common Pleas Court granting plaintiff-appellee, Timothy A. Echemann ("Tim"), relief from judgment. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the trial court.
{¶ 2} Tom, Tim, and Pat Echemann ("Pat") were equal partners in Echo Outdoor, an Ohio partnership which owned and operated three billboards in or near Sidney, Ohio. (Doc. Nos. 142, 147).
{¶ 3} On September 28, 2015, Tim filed a complaint with the trial court seeking a judicial dissolution of Echo Outdoor.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scott Holding Co., Inc. v. Turbo Restaurants US, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. HurrOhio Court of Appeals · 2024