Legal Opinion

Brouse v. Law

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1899No. Sac. No. 766Published

WRIT of review from the Supreme Court to annul an order of the Superior Court of Merced County, in so far as designating a newspaper for the publication of notice to the creditors of a deceased person. J. K. Law, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

After the superior court of Merced county had admitted to probate the last will and testament of Augus .tine Smith, deceased, and had issued letters testamentary thereon to the petitioner, it made the following order:

“It is ordered that notice to the creditors of Augustine Smith, deceased, requiring all persons having claims against said deceased to exhibit them with the necessary vouchers to Lillian M. Brouse, executrix of the last will and testament of Augustine Smith, deceased, at her residence or place of business, to be specified in said notice, be given by said executrix by publication…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnston v. Superior Court of Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API