Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Coughlin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 7, 1999No. D842153; CA A96536PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

In this domestic relations case, husband appeals from a decision that allowed wife’s motion to terminate her obligation to pay him spousal support and implicitly denied his motion to increase spousal support. ORS 107.135 (1995). We affirm.

Husband and wife were married in 1971, and their marriage was dissolved in 1986. In a memorandum opinion issued before the entry of the original dissolution judgment, the trial court indicated that husband was

“permanently disabled as the result of a brain aneurysm which he suffered in 1983. As a result of the aneurysm he has received frontal lobe brain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel Johnson v. BailOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. In re the Marriage of GohlmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of WeberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API