Legal Opinion
Harden-Bey v. Rutter
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 12, 2008No. 06-1473PublishedCited by 411 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Cary Harden-Bey, an incarcerated pro se litigant, challenges the dismissal under § 1997e(c) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c), of his § 1983 claims against several employees of the Michigan Department of Corrections. Because Harden-Bey has stated a cognizable due-process claim, we reverse that part of the district court’s order. And because he has failed to state a cognizable cruel- and-unusual-punishment claim under the Eighth (and Fourteenth) Amendment or a cognizable equal-protection claim under the Fourteenth Amendment, we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Keith Harbin-Bey v. Lyle RutterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by411 opinions
- Williams v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Yassin Aref v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Bishawi v. Northeast Ohio Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Rezaq v. NalleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Timothy Finley v. Erica HussCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
406 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.