Seiler v. Farley (In Re Farley)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiffs Terrence Seiler and Karen Bray seek a determination that a debt owed to them by debtor/defendant Daniel J. Farley is not dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and/or 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4).
Debtor denies that these provisions of the Bankruptcy Code affect the discharge-ability of the debt.
Judgment will be entered in favor of debtor and against plaintiffs, who have failed to show that the debt in question is not dischargeable pursuant to these provisions.
I
FACTS
Debtor held himself out as an expert on tax shelters and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Specialty Plastics, Inc. v. Doemling (In Re Specialty Plastics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- McMillen v. Jarmul (In Re Jarmul)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kuper v. Spar (In Re Spar)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Freer v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Burt Building Material Corp. v. Silba (In Re Silba)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Sibbet v. Presutti (In re Presutti)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015