Legal Opinion

Seiler v. Farley (In Re Farley)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1993No. 19-20091PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiffs Terrence Seiler and Karen Bray seek a determination that a debt owed to them by debtor/defendant Daniel J. Farley is not dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and/or 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4).

Debtor denies that these provisions of the Bankruptcy Code affect the discharge-ability of the debt.

Judgment will be entered in favor of debtor and against plaintiffs, who have failed to show that the debt in question is not dischargeable pursuant to these provisions.

I

FACTS

Debtor held himself out as an expert on tax shelters and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Specialty Plastics, Inc. v. Doemling (In Re Specialty Plastics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. McMillen v. Jarmul (In Re Jarmul)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kuper v. Spar (In Re Spar)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  2. Freer v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  3. Burt Building Material Corp. v. Silba (In Re Silba)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  4. Sibbet v. Presutti (In re Presutti)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API