Legal Opinion

Virginian Railway Co. v. Hood

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 17, 1929PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

This is an action by motion to recover damages occasioned by the flooding of certain lands in Nottoway county. Designating the parties as they were designated in the trial court, the defendant, Virginian Railway Company, in 1922, undertook the construction of a dam in Nottoway river to impound water for its engines. Before undertaking this work, surveys indicated that a part of the lower portion of plaintiff’s land would probably be flooded, although the dam which it proposed to build was to be placed some distance below. Plaintiff’s holding consisted of one tract of about 502.5 acres lying…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New River Mineral Co. v. PainterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  2. Wright v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
  3. Co-Operative Vineyards Co. v. Ft. Stockton Irrigated Lands Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Thomas v. Greenville-Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  5. Simpson v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. UNIWEST CONST. v. Amtech Elevator ServicesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  2. Dowling v. RowanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  3. Brizzolara v. Sherwood Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. KENE CORPORATION v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  5. Anthony S. Allen, III v. Linda A. AllenCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API