Legal Opinion

Klein v. Marriott International, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 20, 1999No. 98 Civ. 1591 WCC, 98 Civ. 2356 WCC, 98 Civ. 2357 WCCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.

In these diversity actions, plaintiffs seek damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of drinking contaminated water while staying at a hotel in Bermuda. Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the respective Complaints pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the alternative, defendants move to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens. For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motion is granted.

BACKGROUND 1

Defendant Marriott International Services,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Filetech S.A. v. France Telecom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Edwin Kerr v. Compagnie De Ultramar and Transmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API