Legal Opinion
Onick v. Long
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 1957No. Civ. 17506PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
The seven appellants joined with 14 others as plaintiffs. They appeal from judgment of nonsuit entered against them. The appeal is presented on a settled statement. The defendants are James Long, sheriff of Contra Costa County; Ray Stoffels, deputy sheriff; E. F. Phipps, chief of police of the city of Richmond; W. E. Pendergast, district liquor control administrator; and John Pippin, a liquor control officer.
Appellants, excepting Kelly, grounded their action on false arrest and false imprisonment. Kelly’s action was for wrongful trespass on his place of business and damage to his business by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hughes v. OrebCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Weber v. Marine Cooks' & Stewards' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Moffatt v. Buffums' Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Huang v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Priest v. RotaryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
- Property Reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Joaquin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Rody v. WinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Property Reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Joaquin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016