Legal Opinion
In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 22, 1991No. 18-13004PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A PROOF OF CLAIM
FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge * .
Barclays filed the instant motion 1 to enlarge the time to file a proof of claim. We deny Barclays’ motion because Barclays received actual notice of the claims bar date and its failure to file timely does not meet the excusable neglect standard articulated in Bankruptcy Rule 9006(b)(1). Alternatively, Barclays’ attempt to characterize a request for payment letter directed to DBL as an informal proof of claim fails because it was never filed with the Bankruptcy Court.
The deadline for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- In the Matter of Pizza of Hawaii, Inc., Debtor. Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re South Atlantic Financial Corp., Etc., Debtors. Biscayne 21 Condominium Association, Inc. v. South Atlantic Financial Corp., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- In Re Vertientes, Ltd., Debtor. Vertientes, Ltd. v. Internor Trade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Hassett v. Weissman (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- In Re Keene Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc. (In Re Houbigant, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Houbigant, Inc. v. ACB Mercantile, Inc. (In Re Houbigant, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In Re ColeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.