Legal Opinion
Condon-Cunningham, Inc. v. Day
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
Decided December 15, 1969No. 853345PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcMahon, J.
On March. 29, 1962, Condon-Cunning-ham, Inc., and M. F. Yelotta & Sons, Inc., a joint venture (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs), entered into a contract with William P. Day, Henry W. Speeth and Frank M. Gorman, constituting the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as defendant), to make certain highway improvements in Cuyahoga County, involving among other things the construction, improvement and partial relocation of Roekside Road from Brecks-ville Road to Turney Road.
The Agreement, Proposal and Contract Bond for this project (Plffs’ Ex. 1) states what was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Providence Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Absher Construction Co. v. Kent School District No. 415Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- R.J. Wildner Contracting Co. v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- Midwest Dredging Co. v. McAninch Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- S & M Constructors, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.