Legal Opinion

McShan v. Sherrill

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1960No. 16538PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.

Appellees own land which at one time bordered on the east bank of the Colorado River. The river has since shifted to the west, and appellees claim the land now lying between their property and the present river bed on the basis of acere*463tion. Appellants dispute that claim; and they have attempted to prove that the change in the river bed was perceptible and sudden, it having been agreed that accretion occurs only upon a gradual and imperceptible shifting of a river. See State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, 1923, 280 U.S. 606, 43 S.Ct. 221, 67 L.Ed. 428; State of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Quabaug Rubber Company v. Fabiano Shoe Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Puyallup Indian Tribe v. Port of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Padgett v. TheusAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API