City of Columbus v. Budget Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The single question presented by this record is whether the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful.
The gist of the complaint of the city is that the Board of Tax Appeals denied its appeal which in effect was an affirmance of the budget commission’s apportionment of the local government fund (sales tax),
By the terms of Sections 5625-23, 5625-24 and 5625-25, General Code, it is the duty of the budget commission to pass upon and adjust the budget of each taxing authority within the county to the end that the tax rate shall be kept within the limitations provided by law.
S…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Bd. of Commrs. v. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- Board of County Commissioners v. Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Budget Commission v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1964