Legal Opinion

Lincoln National Health & Casualty v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 19, 2001No. 5D00-343PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Lincoln National Health & Casualty Company (Lincoln National) appeals the final summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of appellees. The trial court determined that Lincoln National has no legal right to pursue a claim for equitable subrogation against the appel-lees. We reverse based upon application of the law of the case doctrine.1

The facts underlying the instant litigation are succinctly set forth in our prior opinion in Lincoln Nat’l. Health & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Am., Inc., 666 So.2d 159 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 676 So.2d 1369 (Fla.1996)(Lincoln *394Na…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kala Investments, Inc. v. SklarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Dantzler Lumber & Export Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Fla. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. NATIONAL UNION FIRE v. KPMG Peat MarwickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. KPMG Peat Marwick v. NAT. UNION FIRE INS. CO.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API